- If you ever shop online, use this free app to apply every promo code on the internet to your cart. You have ready access to vi and emacs on the Mac. You can use either (or even both) of those, if you want to hang out with the uber-geek crowd. If you want a plain simple code editor, you can try Atom.
- Showing results for 'best script editor' as the word free is considered too common Platypus Free Platypus is a developer tool for the Mac OS X operating system.
- The Best Free Text Editors for Windows, Linux, and Mac Lori Kaufman April 28, 2012, 12:00pm EDT We all use text editors to take notes, save web addresses, write code, as well as other uses.
- JavaScript is a powerful scripting language and a great choice to learn for creating online interactive elements. Discover how to use the JavaScript scripting language on your Mac, with our simple.
The Shell Script editor included in EditRocket includes many tools to make Shell Script programming easier. Listed below is information on the Shell Script specific tools offered by EditRocket. See the General Highlights section at the bottom of the page for more of what EditRocket has to offer.
Active6 years, 6 months ago
Possible Duplicate:
What IDEs are available for R in Linux?
Recommendations for Windows text editor for R
What IDEs are available for R in Linux?
Recommendations for Windows text editor for R
Which IDE or TextEditor do you use to write R code?
Community♦
ChristianChristian11.5k3131 gold badges9999 silver badges164164 bronze badges
marked as duplicate by Shog9♦Aug 2 '11 at 16:43
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
8 Answers
I've been using Eclipse/StatET. However, there's a new FLOSS IDE that was released today that looks interesting called RStudio. It even supports Sweave, so once it becomes more polished I may switch. User input seemed a little sluggish when I played with it earlier today however.
Update
They have been actively updating RStudio every month or two. It's been months since I encountered even a minor bug. And the features added are really useful--seamless package development and native Git support being the two that come to mind.
Ari B. FriedmanAri B. Friedman49.5k2828 gold badges155155 silver badges216216 bronze badges
This is ultimately a very subjective question, and will depend on your OS, etc.
I prefer Eclipse (StatET) because I use it for all my development and it has many rich features (e.g. SVN integration, Sweave/Latex integration, project management). If you use Emacs, then ESS is great. This clearly depends on what you like.
I used Tinn-R before, but ultimately I prefer to have one IDE for everything, and Eclipse has a much wider general adoption.
Shane![Mac Mac](/uploads/1/2/4/7/124786869/742618752.png)
81.6k2929 gold badges204204 silver badges213213 bronze badges
I use Eclipse with the StatET plugin.
Pros:
- Supports everything you'd expect (syntax highlighting, code folding, etc..) but also has s ome nice R interaction pieces.
- You get all the bells and whistles of Eclipse. For example, we use SVN with our R code and the Subclipse plugin is awesome.
Cons:
- Eclipse is a beast.
92.4k1313 gold badges137137 silver badges198198 bronze badges
My preferred tool on all platforms is the ESS mode for Emacs.
Dirk EddelbuettelDirk Eddelbuettel292k4242 gold badges541541 silver badges625625 bronze badges
I've been using TINN-R for several years and have been very happy with it. It allows you to highlight portions of your code and click to send it to the interpreter, or send one line at a time or the entire file.
kpierce8kpierce810.5k22 gold badges1818 silver badges2525 bronze badges
I use Jedit along with Romain Francios's edit mode for R (http://romainfrancois.blog.free.fr/index.php?post/2009/03/16/A-better-jedit-edit-mode-for-R).
Rahul PremrajRahul Premraj
I actually use Textmate and enjoy it quite a bit. But I wouldn't recommend adopting Textmate for R, however if you already use Textmate it's fantastic.
DanDan3,40866 gold badges3434 silver badges4040 bronze badges
I'm not really familiar with the R-Project but I use PSPad.
It allows you to organize your (text-)files in a project style fashion.
ThysThys5,6432525 gold badges8282 silver badges130130 bronze badges
Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged ider or ask your own question.
There are thousands of paid-for and free fonts available these days. But sometimes, when you just can't find exactly what you're looking for, creating a your own typeface could be the way to go – imagine that in your design portfolio!
Making your own fonts can be some of the most inspiring work you ever do but finding the font editor that's right for you can be more than a little bit tricky. Here are five of the most popular font editors, complete with pros and cons.
01. Fontlab Studio
At $649, FontLab Studio opens up the whole gamut of type design, from designing a single font to crafting a whole typeface library.
Pros:
- Imports and exports fonts with support for up to 65,535 glyphs in a wide range of font formats
- Offers an extended toolset
- Can be used for a wide range of tasks, from outline editing to TrueType manual instructing
- Scriptable
- Runs on Mac as well as Windows
Cons:
- Steep learning curve
- Updates come rarely
- Can be buggy
- Documentation is less than satisfactory
- Limited OpenType (no support for Arabic features, for example)
- No native UFO file format support
- Expensive
02. FontCreator
Boasting over 4.5 million downloads to date, FontCreator is a popular font editor among creatives. Native to Windows, FontCreator's feature set makes it suitable for professionals, with a straightforward interface making it accessible to users at any skill level.
Pros:
- Affordable
- Add up to 65,535 glyphs per font
- Create and edit TrueType and OpenType fonts
- Create and edit Web Open Font Format (WOFF) fonts
- Create and edit scalable color fonts
- Redesign existing characters
Cons:
- Windows only
03. Fontographer
Coming in at $399, this is a cheaper option from the makers of FontLab, ideal for smaller projects.
Pros:
![Best Script Editor For Mac Best Script Editor For Mac](/uploads/1/2/4/7/124786869/194364376.png)
- Quite easy to use
- Intuitive interface
- Automated processes
- Imports and exports fonts with 32,000 glyphs in a wide range of font formats
- Runs on Mac as well as Windows
Cons:
- OpenType features are not preserved upon opening a font and code cannot be edited in the app, only imported as a feature-file
- No native UFO support
04. Glyphs
For beginners and casual users right through to seasoned type designers, and a snip at $300.
Pros:
- Easy to learn, easy to use
- Combined text and drawing views, in which layers can be automatically generated
- Basic OpenType features that can be previewed
- Scriptable and expandable
- Extremely fast updates
- Amazing support
- Comes in two versions
Cons:
- Mac only
05. Robofont
For those looking for a scalable tool, and prepared to spend €400 for the privilege.
Pros:
- Built in Python support and scalable
- Loads of extra functions already available from a dedicated community
- Full scripting access to objects and interface
- Perfect base on which to build additional tools
Best Script Editor For Mac
Cons:
Best Free Text Editor Mac
- Mac only
- Not the tool for quick jobs
Best Script Editor For Mac
This article originally featured in Computer Arts issue 229.